↓ Skip to main content

Reorienting with terrain slope and landmarks

Overview of attention for article published in Memory & Cognition, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Reorienting with terrain slope and landmarks
Published in
Memory & Cognition, October 2012
DOI 10.3758/s13421-012-0254-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniele Nardi, Nora S. Newcombe, Thomas F. Shipley

Abstract

Orientation (or reorientation) is the first step in navigation, because establishing a spatial frame of reference is essential for a sense of location and heading direction. Recent research on nonhuman animals has revealed that the vertical component of an environment provides an important source of spatial information, in both terrestrial and aquatic settings. Nonetheless, humans show large individual and sex differences in the ability to use terrain slope for reorientation. To understand why some participants--mainly women--exhibit a difficulty with slope, we tested reorientation in a richer environment than had been used previously, including both a tilted floor and a set of distinct objects that could be used as landmarks. This environment allowed for the use of two different strategies for solving the task, one based on directional cues (slope gradient) and one based on positional cues (landmarks). Overall, rather than using both cues, participants tended to focus on just one. Although men and women did not differ significantly in their encoding of or reliance on the two strategies, men showed greater confidence in solving the reorientation task. These facts suggest that one possible cause of the female difficulty with slope might be a generally lower spatial confidence during reorientation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 42 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 33%
Student > Master 6 13%
Professor 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 35%
Neuroscience 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Computer Science 4 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 4%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 8 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2016.
All research outputs
#13,375,947
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#759
of 1,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,170
of 172,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#7
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.