↓ Skip to main content

Co-productive agility and four collaborative pathways to sustainability transformations

Overview of attention for article published in Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
250 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
367 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Co-productive agility and four collaborative pathways to sustainability transformations
Published in
Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, January 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102422
Authors

Josephine M. Chambers, Carina Wyborn, Nicole L. Klenk, Melanie Ryan, Anca Serban, Nathan J. Bennett, Ruth Brennan, Lakshmi Charli-Joseph, María E. Fernández-Giménez, Kathleen A. Galvin, Bruce E. Goldstein, Tobias Haller, Rosemary Hill, Claudia Munera, Jeanne L. Nel, Henrik Österblom, Robin S. Reid, Maraja Riechers, Marja Spierenburg, Maria Tengö, Elena Bennett, Amos Brandeis, Paul Chatterton, Jessica J. Cockburn, Christopher Cvitanovic, Pongchai Dumrongrojwatthana, América Paz Durán, Jean-David Gerber, Jonathan M.H. Green, Rebecca Gruby, Angela M. Guerrero, Andra-Ioana Horcea-Milcu, Jasper Montana, Patrick Steyaert, Julie G. Zaehringer, Angela T. Bednarek, K Curran, Salamatu J. Fada, Jon Hutton, Beria Leimona, Tomas Pickering, Renee Rondeau

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 250 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 367 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 367 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 65 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 13%
Student > Master 35 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 4%
Other 55 15%
Unknown 132 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 65 18%
Social Sciences 62 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 7%
Arts and Humanities 10 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 3%
Other 43 12%
Unknown 151 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 206. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2023.
All research outputs
#194,463
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#60
of 2,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,921
of 522,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 522,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.