↓ Skip to main content

A possible variant of neuro-Behçet disease presenting chronic progressive ataxia without mucocutaneo-ocular symptoms

Overview of attention for article published in Rheumatology International, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
A possible variant of neuro-Behçet disease presenting chronic progressive ataxia without mucocutaneo-ocular symptoms
Published in
Rheumatology International, August 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00296-006-0171-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masaki Hirose, Takeshi Ikeuchi, Shintaro Hayashi, Kenshi Terajima, Kotaro Endo, Tsunemi Hayashi, Akiyoshi Kakita, Teruo Kimura, Hitoshi Takahashi, Masatoyo Nishizawa

Abstract

Behçet disease (BD) is a chronic relapsing multisystem disorder of unknown etiology, which preferentially affects the oral and genital mucous membranes, skin, and eyes. Neurological involvement is one of the most serious manifestations of BD, known as neuro-Behçet disease (NBD). We here describe clinical, radiological, and neuropathological findings for two patients with a possible variant of NBD, who manifested progressive ataxia in the absence of mucocutaneo-ocular signs characteristic for BD. Both patients presented a slowly progressive cerebellar phenotype, accompanied by behavioral changes and sphincter disturbance. Brain MRI scan revealed mild atrophy in pons and cerebellum. Both patients showed a mild CSF pleocytosis, and were positive for HLA-B51. The post-mortem examination performed in one patient, showed widespread foci of chronic encephalitis, consistent with the diagnosis of NBD. Steroid pulse therapy was effective in one patient. Identifying the progressive ataxia phenotype of NBD without mucocutaneo-ocular symptoms is important, because these patients may benefit from early steroid therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 6%
Portugal 1 6%
Unknown 14 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 19%
Student > Master 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 38%
Neuroscience 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2013.
All research outputs
#14,616,041
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from Rheumatology International
#1,432
of 2,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,682
of 66,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rheumatology International
#11
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.