↓ Skip to main content

Concepts for risk-based surveillance in the field of veterinary medicine and veterinary public health: Review of current approaches

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
243 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
374 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Concepts for risk-based surveillance in the field of veterinary medicine and veterinary public health: Review of current approaches
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, December 2006
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-6-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katharina DC Stärk, Gertraud Regula, Jorge Hernandez, Lea Knopf, Klemens Fuchs, Roger S Morris, Peter Davies

Abstract

Emerging animal and zoonotic diseases and increasing international trade have resulted in an increased demand for veterinary surveillance systems. However, human and financial resources available to support government veterinary services are becoming more and more limited in many countries world-wide. Intuitively, issues that present higher risks merit higher priority for surveillance resources as investments will yield higher benefit-cost ratios. The rapid rate of acceptance of this core concept of risk-based surveillance has outpaced the development of its theoretical and practical bases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 374 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 2%
Brazil 6 2%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 344 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 79 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 17%
Student > Master 52 14%
Professor 28 7%
Student > Bachelor 25 7%
Other 77 21%
Unknown 49 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 113 30%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 92 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 11%
Environmental Science 18 5%
Social Sciences 9 2%
Other 39 10%
Unknown 63 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,253,375
of 23,230,825 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,494
of 7,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,365
of 157,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#11
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,230,825 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.