↓ Skip to main content

Recent developments in doping testing for erythropoietin

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Recent developments in doping testing for erythropoietin
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, June 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00216-011-5116-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Reichel

Abstract

The constant development of new erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), since the first introduction of recombinant erythropoietin (rhEpo) for clinical use, has also necessitated constant development of methods for detecting the abuse of these substances. Doping with ESAs is prohibited according to the World Anti-Doping Code and its prohibited list of substances and methods. Since the first publication of a direct and urine-based detection method in 2000, which uses changes in the Epo isoform profile as detected by isoelectric focusing in polyacrylamide slab gels (IEF-PAGE), the method has been constantly adapted to the appearance of new ESAs (e.g., Dynepo, Mircera). Blood had to be introduced as an additional matrix, because Mircera (a PEGylated Epo) is best confirmed in serum or plasma after immunoaffinity purification. A Mircera ELISA was developed for fast screening of sera. With the appearance of Dynepo and copy epoetins, the additional application of sodium dodecylsulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE or equivalent) became necessary. The haematological module of the Athlete Biological Passport is the latest development in multivariable indirect testing for ESA doping. The article summarizes the main strategies currently used in Epo anti-doping testing with special focus on new developments made between 2009 and 2010.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 62 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Student > Master 10 14%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 25%
Chemistry 17 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 13 19%