| Title |
Functional Analysis Identifies Damaging CHEK2 Missense Variants Associated with Increased Cancer RiskFunctional Analysis and Cancer Risk of CHEK2 Missense VUS
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Research, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1158/0008-5472.can-21-1845 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rick A.C.M. Boonen, Wouter W. Wiegant, Nandi Celosse, Bas Vroling, Stephan Heijl, Zsofia Kote-Jarai, Martina Mijuskovic, Simona Cristea, Nienke Solleveld-Westerink, Tom van Wezel, Niko Beerenwinkel, Rosalind Eeles, Peter Devilee, Maaike P.G. Vreeswijk, Giancarlo Marra, Haico van Attikum |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 5 | 36% |
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| France | 2 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 64% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 16% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 17 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2022.
All research outputs
#4,136,483
of 25,304,569 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Research
#3,990
of 19,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,953
of 517,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Research
#35
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,304,569 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.