| Title |
Foundations of Black Hole Accretion Disk Theory
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Living Reviews in Relativity, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.12942/lrr-2013-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marek A. Abramowicz, P. Chris Fragile |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 14% |
| Brazil | 1 | 14% |
| China | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| China | 2 | <1% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 243 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 67 | 26% |
| Researcher | 49 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 12% |
| Unknown | 41 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 196 | 76% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Engineering | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 43 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,504,618
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Living Reviews in Relativity
#52
of 150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,949
of 297,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Living Reviews in Relativity
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.