↓ Skip to main content

Weak mismatch epitaxy and structural Feedback in graphene growth on copper foil

Overview of attention for article published in Nano Research, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
Title
Weak mismatch epitaxy and structural Feedback in graphene growth on copper foil
Published in
Nano Research, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12274-013-0285-y
Authors

Neil R. Wilson, Alexander J. Marsden, Mohammed Saghir, Catherine J. Bromley, Renald Schaub, Giovanni Costantini, Thomas W. White, Cerianne Partridge, Alexei Barinov, Pavel Dudin, Ana M. Sanchez, James J. Mudd, Marc Walker, Gavin R. Bell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 3%
Germany 4 3%
Italy 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 146 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 33%
Researcher 31 19%
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 16 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 61 38%
Materials Science 30 19%
Chemistry 24 15%
Engineering 14 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 1%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 21 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2013.
All research outputs
#15,261,106
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from Nano Research
#721
of 2,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,060
of 284,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nano Research
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,836 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.