↓ Skip to main content

De Novo Mutations in CHD4, an ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeler Gene, Cause an Intellectual Disability Syndrome with Distinctive Dysmorphisms

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Human Genetics, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
De Novo Mutations in CHD4, an ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeler Gene, Cause an Intellectual Disability Syndrome with Distinctive Dysmorphisms
Published in
American Journal of Human Genetics, September 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.08.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karin Weiss, Paulien A. Terhal, Lior Cohen, Michael Bruccoleri, Melita Irving, Ariel F. Martinez, Jill A. Rosenfeld, Keren Machol, Yaping Yang, Pengfei Liu, Magdalena Walkiewicz, Joke Beuten, Natalia Gomez-Ospina, Katrina Haude, Chin-To Fong, Gregory M. Enns, Jonathan A. Bernstein, Judith Fan, Garrett Gotway, Mohammad Ghorbani, DDD Study, Koen van Gassen, Glen R. Monroe, Gijs van Haaften, Lina Basel-Vanagaite, Xiang-Jiao Yang, Philippe M. Campeau, Maximilian Muenke

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 137 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 19%
Researcher 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Master 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 31 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 46 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 13%
Neuroscience 9 6%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 34 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,815,678
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Genetics
#1,934
of 6,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,938
of 347,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Genetics
#43
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,012 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.