↓ Skip to main content

Frontiers

Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea and the Critical Role of Oral-Facial Growth: Evidences

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
16 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
Title
Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea and the Critical Role of Oral-Facial Growth: Evidences
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2012.00184
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu-Shu Huang, Christian Guilleminault

Abstract

Aims: Review of evidence in support of an oral-facial growth impairment in the development of pediatric sleep apnea in non-obese children. Method: Review of experimental data from infant monkeys with experimentally induced nasal resistance. Review of early historical data in the orthodontic literature indicating the abnormal oral-facial development associated with mouth breathing and nasal resistance. Review of the progressive demonstration of sleep-disordered-breathing (SDB) in children who underwent incomplete treatment of OSA with adenotonsillectomy, and demonstration of abnormal oral-facial anatomy that must often be treated in order for the resolution of OSA. Review of data of long-term recurrence of OSA and indication of oral-facial myofunctional dysfunction in association with the recurrence of OSA. Results: Presentation of prospective data on premature infants and SDB-treated children, supporting the concept of oral-facial hypotonia. Presentation of evidence supporting hypotonia as a primary element in the development of oral-facial anatomic abnormalities leading to abnormal breathing during sleep. Continuous interaction between oral-facial muscle tone, maxillary-mandibular growth and development of SDB. Role of myofunctional reeducation with orthodontics and elimination of upper airway soft tissue in the treatment of non-obese SDB children. Conclusion: Pediatric OSA in non-obese children is a disorder of oral-facial growth.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 2%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 148 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 17%
Other 17 11%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Other 34 22%
Unknown 46 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Neuroscience 2 1%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 52 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,994,515
of 23,507,888 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#1,938
of 12,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,201
of 284,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#17
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,507,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.