| Title |
Human–Tiger Conflict in Context: Risks to Lives and Livelihoods in the Bangladesh Sundarbans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Ecology, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10745-012-9556-6 |
| Authors |
Chloe Inskip, Martin Ridout, Zubair Fahad, Rowan Tully, Adam Barlow, Christina Greenwood Barlow, Md. Anwar Islam, Thomas Roberts, Douglas MacMillan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 234 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 19% |
| Researcher | 45 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 38 | 16% |
| Unknown | 41 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 78 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 66 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Unknown | 54 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,117,190
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from Human Ecology
#45
of 794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,229
of 291,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Ecology
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 794 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.