↓ Skip to main content

The empirical case against introspection

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Studies, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The empirical case against introspection
Published in
Philosophical Studies, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11098-016-0623-5
Authors

Rik Peels

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Unspecified 2 7%
Other 7 26%
Unknown 6 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 12 44%
Psychology 5 19%
Unspecified 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Unknown 6 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2016.
All research outputs
#8,018,887
of 24,250,928 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Studies
#283
of 1,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,392
of 404,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Studies
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,250,928 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,385 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.