↓ Skip to main content

Analyses on Activation of NF-κB and Effect of Bortezomib in Canine Neoplastic Lymphoid Cell Lines

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analyses on Activation of NF-κB and Effect of Bortezomib in Canine Neoplastic Lymphoid Cell Lines
Published in
Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, January 2013
DOI 10.1292/jvms.12-0168
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ko KOJIMA, Yasuhito FUJINO, Yuko GOTO-KOSHINO, Koichi OHNO, Hajime TSUJIMOTO

Abstract

Lymphoid malignancies, such as leukemia, and many types of lymphoma are common and severe disorders in dogs. Since shortening remission duration caused by resistance to chemotherapy often becomes clinically critical problems, development of novel and effective therapy should be required. The present study investigated the status of NF-κB and effect of its inhibitor, bortezomib, in six canine neoplastic lymphoid cell lines. NF-κB p65 and p50 were detected in the nuclear fraction of GL-1, CLBL-1 and CL-1, suggesting that NF-κB was constitutively activated in the cells. NF-κB p65 was detected in the cytoplasmic fraction of UL-1 and Ema. After incubation with bortezomib, NF-κB p50 and p65 became undetectable in the nuclear fraction of GL-1, CLBL-1 and CL-1, and CLBL-1, respectively, and p65 was clearly degraded in the cytoplasmic fraction of CLBL-1 and CL-1. Bortezomib inhibited the proliferation of all cell lines except Nody-1 in a concentration-dependent manner. The results indicated that constitutive activation of NF-κB could contribute to the proliferation of canine neoplastic lymphoid cells, and bortezomib would have suppressive effects on the NF-κB activation and the proliferation of neoplastic lymphoid cells in dogs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 17%
Professor 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 6 26%
Unknown 5 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2013.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
#1,596
of 3,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,222
of 286,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
#12
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,546 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.