| Title |
Predictors of Aspiration Pneumonia: How Important Is Dysphagia?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Dysphagia, February 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1007/pl00009559 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susan E. Langmore, Margaret S. Terpenning, Anthony Schork, Yinmiao Chen, Joseph T. Murray, Dennis Lopatin, Walter J. Loesche |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 15% |
| United States | 5 | 15% |
| Canada | 3 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 12% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 728 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 714 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 162 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 99 | 14% |
| Other | 72 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 7% |
| Researcher | 48 | 7% |
| Other | 122 | 17% |
| Unknown | 173 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 180 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 167 | 23% |
| Linguistics | 42 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 38 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 4% |
| Other | 67 | 9% |
| Unknown | 208 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,301,851
of 25,822,778 outputs
Outputs from Dysphagia
#39
of 1,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#954
of 95,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dysphagia
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,822,778 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them