↓ Skip to main content

Some remarks on the Gribov ambiguity

Overview of attention for article published in Communications in Mathematical Physics, February 1978
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
647 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Some remarks on the Gribov ambiguity
Published in
Communications in Mathematical Physics, February 1978
DOI 10.1007/bf01609471
Authors

I. M. Singer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 26 72%
Mathematics 4 11%
Unknown 6 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2016.
All research outputs
#7,487,068
of 22,886,568 outputs
Outputs from Communications in Mathematical Physics
#368
of 2,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,942
of 24,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Communications in Mathematical Physics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,886,568 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,522 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 24,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them