↓ Skip to main content

Mapping the complete glycoproteome of virion-derived HIV-1 gp120 provides insights into broadly neutralizing antibody binding

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mapping the complete glycoproteome of virion-derived HIV-1 gp120 provides insights into broadly neutralizing antibody binding
Published in
Scientific Reports, September 2016
DOI 10.1038/srep32956
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Panico, Laura Bouché, Daniel Binet, Michael-John O’Connor, Dinah Rahman, Poh-Choo Pang, Kevin Canis, Simon J. North, Ronald C. Desrosiers, Elena Chertova, Brandon F. Keele, Julian W. Bess, Jeffrey D. Lifson, Stuart M. Haslam, Anne Dell, Howard R. Morris

Abstract

The surface envelope glycoprotein (SU) of Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), gp120(SU) plays an essential role in virus binding to target CD4+ T-cells and is a major vaccine target. Gp120 has remarkably high levels of N-linked glycosylation and there is considerable evidence that this "glycan shield" can help protect the virus from antibody-mediated neutralization. In recent years, however, it has become clear that gp120 glycosylation can also be included in the targets of recognition by some of the most potent broadly neutralizing antibodies. Knowing the site-specific glycosylation of gp120 can facilitate the rational design of glycopeptide antigens for HIV vaccine development. While most prior studies have focused on glycan analysis of recombinant forms of gp120, here we report the first systematic glycosylation site analysis of gp120 derived from virions produced by infected T lymphoid cells and show that a single site is exclusively substituted with complex glycans. These results should help guide the design of vaccine immunogens.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 22%
Researcher 13 21%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 4 6%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Chemistry 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 14 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2023.
All research outputs
#16,958,556
of 24,929,945 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#86,866
of 136,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,613
of 340,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2,407
of 3,725 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,929,945 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,725 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.