Title |
Are Adjunct Faculty Exploited: Some Grounds for Skepticism
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Business Ethics, September 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10551-016-3322-4 |
Authors |
Jason Brennan, Phillip Magness |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 22% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 13% |
Lecturer | 3 | 9% |
Researcher | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 6 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 9 | 28% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 19% |
Philosophy | 3 | 9% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 6% |
Psychology | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 7 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,932,787
of 23,197,711 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#323
of 2,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,736
of 333,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#6
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,197,711 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.