You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Errors in clinical reasoning: causes and remedial strategies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.b1860 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ian A Scott |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 38% |
| Comoros | 1 | 13% |
| Mexico | 1 | 13% |
| France | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 282 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 35 | 12% |
| Researcher | 35 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 10% |
| Other | 88 | 30% |
| Unknown | 49 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 148 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 7% |
| Psychology | 16 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 38 | 13% |
| Unknown | 57 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,602,595
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#15,546
of 64,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,004
of 125,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#28
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,461 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.