↓ Skip to main content

Prospective evaluation of respiratory exacerbations in children with cystic fibrosis from newborn screening to 5 years of age

Overview of attention for article published in Thorax, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prospective evaluation of respiratory exacerbations in children with cystic fibrosis from newborn screening to 5 years of age
Published in
Thorax, January 2013
DOI 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202342
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine Ann Byrnes, Suzanna Vidmar, Joyce L Cheney, John B Carlin, David S Armstrong, Peter J Cooper, Keith Grimwood, Marj Moodie, Colin F Robertson, Margaret Rosenfeld, Harm A Tiddens, Claire E Wainwright, for the ACFBAL Study Investigators, Claire E Wainwright, Keith Grimwood, Joyce Cheney, Paul W Francis, Carolyn Dakin, Narelle George, John B Carlin, Suzanna Vidmar, Colin F Robertson, Rosemary Carzino, Marj Moodie, Robert Carter, Anita Lal, David S Armstrong, Peter J Cooper, Karen McKay, A Martin, Bruce Whitehead, Catherine A Byrnes, Merrin Harger, Jan Tate, Harm A Tiddens, Karla Graniel, Krista Gerbrands, Lauren Mott

Abstract

Newborn screening allows novel treatments for cystic fibrosis (CF) to be trialled in early childhood before irreversible lung injury occurs. As respiratory exacerbations are a potential trial outcome variable, we determined their rate, duration and clinical features in preschool children with CF; and whether they were associated with growth, lung structure and function at age 5 years.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 100 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Other 30 29%
Unknown 19 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Psychology 5 5%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 22 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2017.
All research outputs
#2,853,801
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from Thorax
#1,204
of 5,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,075
of 280,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thorax
#17
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.