↓ Skip to main content

Uranium quantification in semen by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Uranium quantification in semen by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
Published in
Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, September 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.jtemb.2012.07.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Todor I. Todorov, John W. Ejnik, Gustavo Guandalini, Hanna Xu, Dennis Hoover, Larry Anderson, Katherine Squibb, Melissa A. McDiarmid, Jose A. Centeno

Abstract

In this study we report uranium analysis for human semen samples. Uranium quantification was performed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. No additives, such as chymotrypsin or bovine serum albumin, were used for semen liquefaction, as they showed significant uranium content. For method validation we spiked 2g aliquots of pooled control semen at three different levels of uranium: low at 5 pg/g, medium at 50 pg/g, and high at 1000 pg/g. The detection limit was determined to be 0.8 pg/g uranium in human semen. The data reproduced within 1.4-7% RSD and spike recoveries were 97-100%. The uranium level of the unspiked, pooled control semen was 2.9 pg/g of semen (n=10). In addition six semen samples from a cohort of Veterans exposed to depleted uranium (DU) in the 1991 Gulf War were analyzed with no knowledge of their exposure history. Uranium levels in the Veterans' semen samples ranged from undetectable (<0.8 pg/g) to 3350 pg/g. This wide concentration range for uranium in semen is consistent with known differences in current DU body burdens in these individuals, some of whom have retained embedded DU fragments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
France 1 6%
Unknown 15 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 29%
Engineering 2 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 12%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2018.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology
#513
of 1,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,257
of 188,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.