↓ Skip to main content

Tumor-associated macrophages as a prognostic parameter in multiple myeloma

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Hematology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Tumor-associated macrophages as a prognostic parameter in multiple myeloma
Published in
Annals of Hematology, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00277-012-1652-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elif Suyanı, Gülsan Türköz Sucak, Nalân Akyürek, Sevinç Şahin, Nuran Ahu Baysal, Münci Yağcı, Rauf Haznedar

Abstract

The interaction between multiple myeloma (MM) cells and the bone marrow stroma constitutes the basis of myeloma pathogenesis and has led the way for the corresponding therapeutic strategies. The aim of this study is to evaluate tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) which is an important element of bone marrow stroma and its prognostic relevance in newly diagnosed MM patients. We also wanted to determine the association between TAMs and microvessel density (MVD). Sixty-eight patients, who were diagnosed with MM at the Department of Hematology, Gazi University Hospital, between January 2000 and January 2011, were reviewed retrospectively. Tumor-associated macrophages were evaluated by staining with anti-CD68 and anti-CD163 monoclonal antibodies, and MVD was evaluated by factor VIII staining. Median age was 60 (range, 40-84) years with 36 males and 32 females. The number of both CD 68+ and CD 163+ cells had a negative impact on OS at 6 years (p = 0.013 vs. 0.036; p = 0.015 vs. 0.039) in univariate and multivariate analysis in which age, sex, ISS, the induction treatment, and response to induction treatment are included as variables. High-grade MVD was found to be associated with increased CD163+ cell count. In conclusion, TAMs seems to be a promising prognostic histopathological marker in newly diagnosed MM patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Student > Master 6 12%
Other 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2020.
All research outputs
#6,920,128
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Hematology
#368
of 2,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,694
of 285,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Hematology
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.