↓ Skip to main content

Patient and Partner Feedback Reports to Improve Statin Medication Adherence: A Randomized Control Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Patient and Partner Feedback Reports to Improve Statin Medication Adherence: A Randomized Control Trial
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11606-016-3858-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashok Reddy, Tiffany L. Huseman, Anne Canamucio, Steven C. Marcus, David A. Asch, Kevin Volpp, Judith A. Long

Abstract

Simple nudges such as reminders and feedback reports to either a patient or a partner may facilitate improved medication adherence. To test the impact of a pill bottle used to monitor adherence, deliver a daily alarm, and generate weekly medication adherence feedback reports on statin adherence. Three-month, three-arm randomized clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02480530). One hundred and twenty-six veterans with known coronary artery disease and poor adherence (medication possession ratio <80 %). Patients were randomized to one of three groups: (1) a control group (n = 36) that received a pill-monitoring device with no alarms or feedback; (2) an individual feedback group (n = 36) that received a daily alarm and a weekly medication adherence feedback report; and (3) a partner feedback group (n = 54) that received an alarm and a weekly feedback report that was shared with a friend, family member, or a peer. The intervention continued for 3 months, and participants were followed for an additional 3 months after the intervention period. Adherence as measured by pill bottle. Secondary outcomes included change in LDL (mg/dl), patient activation, and social support. During the 3-month intervention period, medication adherence was higher in both feedback arms than in the control arm (individual feedback group 89 %, partner feedback group 86 %, control group 67 %; p < 0.001 and = 0.001). At 6 months, there was no difference in medication adherence between either of the feedback groups and the control (individual feedback 60 %, partner feedback 52 %, control group 54 %; p = 0.75 and 0.97). Daily alarms combined with individual or partner feedback reports improved statin medication adherence. While neither an individual feedback nor partner feedback strategy created a sustainable medication adherence habit, the intervention itself is relatively easy to implement and low cost.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 102 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 18%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 7 7%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 31 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Computer Science 7 7%
Psychology 7 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 40 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2019.
All research outputs
#4,727,901
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,931
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,305
of 334,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#36
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.