↓ Skip to main content

Performance on the Cogstate Brief Battery Is Related to Amyloid Levels and Hippocampal Volume in Very Mild Dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Performance on the Cogstate Brief Battery Is Related to Amyloid Levels and Hippocampal Volume in Very Mild Dementia
Published in
Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12031-016-0822-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yen Ying Lim, Victor L. Villemagne, Simon M. Laws, Robert H. Pietrzak, David Ames, Christopher Fowler, Stephanie Rainey-Smith, Peter J. Snyder, Pierrick Bourgeat, Ralph N. Martins, Olivier Salvado, Christopher C. Rowe, Colin L. Masters, Paul Maruff, on behalf of the AIBL Research Group

Abstract

In a group of older adults with very mild dementia, we aimed to characterize the nature and magnitude of cognitive decline as measured by the Cogstate Brief Battery, in relation to Aβ levels and hippocampal volume. Participants were characterized according to their status on the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale. A total of 308 individuals who were CDR 0 and had low cerebral Aβ levels (Aβ-), 32 individuals who were Aβ- and CDR 0.5, and 43 individuals who were Aβ+ and CDR 0.5 were included in this study. Participants completed the CogState brief battery at baseline, and at 18-, 36-, 54- and 72-month follow-up. Linear mixed model analyses indicated that relative to the Aβ- CDR 0 group, the Aβ+ CDR 0.5 group showed increased rates of memory decline and hippocampal volume loss. However, compared to the Aβ- CDR 0 group, the Aβ- CDR 0.5 group showed no changes in cognitive function or hippocampal volume over 72 months. The results of this study confirm that in individuals with very mild dementia, who also have biomarker confirmation of Aβ+, changes in cognitive function manifest primarily as deterioration in memory processing, and this is associated with hippocampal volume loss. Conversely, the absence of any cognitive decline or loss in hippocampal volume in individuals with very mild dementia but who are Aβ- suggests that some other non-AD disease process may underlie any static impairment in cognitive function.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Other 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 14 25%
Unknown 15 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 24%
Neuroscience 11 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 16 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2016.
All research outputs
#4,835,823
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
#229
of 1,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,972
of 348,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
#18
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,643 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.