| Title |
Assessing CSF ctDNA to Improve Diagnostic Accuracy and Therapeutic Monitoring in Breast Cancer Leptomeningeal MetastasisctDNA Detection in Breast Cancer Leptomeningeal Metastasis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Cancer Research, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-3017 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amanda Fitzpatrick, Marjan Iravani, Adam Mills, Lucy Childs, Thanussuyah Alaguthurai, Angela Clifford, Isaac Garcia-Murillas, Steven Van Laere, Luc Dirix, Mark Harries, Alicia Okines, Nicholas C. Turner, Syed Haider, Andrew N.J. Tutt, Clare M. Isacke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 10% |
| Italy | 3 | 6% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 58% |
| Scientists | 10 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 34 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 34 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,139,742
of 25,364,936 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#765
of 13,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,247
of 449,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#23
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,364,936 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.