↓ Skip to main content

Race/Ethnicity, Parent-Identified Emotional Difficulties, and Mental Health Visits Among California Children

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Race/Ethnicity, Parent-Identified Emotional Difficulties, and Mental Health Visits Among California Children
Published in
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11414-012-9298-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jim E. Banta, Sigrid James, Mark G. Haviland, Ronald M. Andersen

Abstract

Variability in mental health services utilization by race/ethnicity was evaluated with a Behavioral Model approach. Subjects were 17,705 children 5 to 11 years of age in the 2005, 2007, and 2009 California Health Interview Surveys. Parents identified minor emotional difficulties in 18.7% of these children (ranging from 14.8% in Asians to 24.4% in African Americans) and definite or severe difficulties in 7.4% (5.5% in Asians to 9.7% in "other race"). Overall, 7.6% of children had at least one mental health visit in the prior year (2.3% in Asians to 11.2% in African Americans). Parent-identified need was the most salient predictor of mental health visits for all racial/ethnic groups. Beyond need, no consistent patterns could be determined across racial/ethnic groups with regard to the relationship between contextual, predisposing, and enabling measures and mental health service utilization. Different factors operated for each racial/ethnic group, suggesting the need for studies to examine mental health need, mental health service use, and determinants by racial/ethnic subgroup. These findings suggest that a "one-size-fits-all approach" with regard to policies and practices aimed at reducing mental health disparities will not be effective for all racial/ethnic groups.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 73 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 16 22%
Unknown 15 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 20 27%
Psychology 12 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 21 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2013.
All research outputs
#15,682,052
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
#351
of 469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,371
of 176,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.