| Title |
Neurocardiological differences between musicians and control subjects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Netherlands Heart Journal, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12471-012-0372-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. L. I. Burggraaf, T. W. Elffers, F. M. Segeth, F. M. C. Austie, M. B. Plug, M. G. J. Gademan, A. C. Maan, S. Man, M. de Muynck, T. Soekkha, A. Simonsz, E. E. van der Wall, M. J. Schalij, C. A. Swenne |
| Abstract |
Exercise training is beneficial in health and disease. Part of the training effect materialises in the brainstem due to the exercise-associated somatosensory nerve traffic. Because active music making also involves somatosensory nerve traffic, we hypothesised that this will have training effects resembling those of physical exercise. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Japan | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 11 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 14% |
| Psychology | 3 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2023.
All research outputs
#928,304
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Netherlands Heart Journal
#16
of 556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,258
of 289,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Netherlands Heart Journal
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.