↓ Skip to main content

Code clones and developer behavior: results of two surveys of the clone research community

Overview of attention for article published in Empirical Software Engineering, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Code clones and developer behavior: results of two surveys of the clone research community
Published in
Empirical Software Engineering, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10664-015-9394-4
Authors

Debarshi Chatterji, Jeffrey C. Carver, Nicholas A. Kraft

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 21%
Student > Master 9 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 14%
Researcher 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 8 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 27 64%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Engineering 2 5%
Unknown 10 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2016.
All research outputs
#20,340,423
of 22,886,568 outputs
Outputs from Empirical Software Engineering
#624
of 706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,037
of 264,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Empirical Software Engineering
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,886,568 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 706 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.