↓ Skip to main content

Developing mathematical practices through reflection cycles

Overview of attention for article published in Mathematics Education Research Journal, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Developing mathematical practices through reflection cycles
Published in
Mathematics Education Research Journal, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13394-016-0175-1
Authors

Daniel L. Reinholz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 15%
Student > Master 9 15%
Researcher 8 14%
Lecturer 6 10%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 8 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 16 27%
Social Sciences 15 25%
Arts and Humanities 3 5%
Computer Science 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 12 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2016.
All research outputs
#4,716,923
of 22,886,568 outputs
Outputs from Mathematics Education Research Journal
#54
of 333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,076
of 343,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mathematics Education Research Journal
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,886,568 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 333 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.