↓ Skip to main content

Animal Disenhancement and the Non-Identity Problem: A Response to Thompson

Overview of attention for article published in NanoEthics, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Animal Disenhancement and the Non-Identity Problem: A Response to Thompson
Published in
NanoEthics, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11569-011-0115-1
Authors

Clare Palmer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 35%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 13 38%
Social Sciences 5 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 6 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2016.
All research outputs
#7,487,068
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from NanoEthics
#87
of 233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,075
of 109,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NanoEthics
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 233 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.