↓ Skip to main content

Systematic identification of interaction effects between genome- and environment-wide associations in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Systematic identification of interaction effects between genome- and environment-wide associations in type 2 diabetes mellitus
Published in
Human Genetics, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00439-012-1258-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chirag J. Patel, Rong Chen, Keiichi Kodama, John P. A. Ioannidis, Atul J. Butte

Abstract

Diseases such as type 2 diabetes (T2D) result from environmental and genetic factors, and risk varies considerably in the population. T2D-related genetic loci discovered to date explain only a small portion of the T2D heritability. Some heritability may be due to gene-environment interactions. However, documenting these interactions has been difficult due to low availability of concurrent genetic and environmental measures, selection bias, and challenges in controlling for multiple hypothesis testing. Through genome-wide association studies (GWAS), investigators have identified over 90 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated to T2D. Using a method analogous to GWAS [environment-wide association study (EWAS)], we found five environmental factors associated with the disease. By focusing on risk factors that emerge from GWAS and EWAS, it is possible to overcome difficulties in uncovering gene-environment interactions. Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), we screened 18 SNPs and 5 serum-based environmental factors for interaction in association to T2D. We controlled for multiple hypotheses using false discovery rate (FDR) and Bonferroni correction and found four interactions with FDR <20 %. The interaction between rs13266634 (SLC30A8) and trans-β-carotene withstood Bonferroni correction (corrected p = 0.006, FDR <1.5 %). The per-risk-allele effect sizes in subjects with low levels of trans-β-carotene were 40 % greater than the marginal effect size [odds ratio (OR) 1.8, 95 % CI 1.3-2.6]. We hypothesize that impaired function driven by rs13266634 increases T2D risk when combined with serum levels of nutrients. Unbiased consideration of environmental and genetic factors may help identify larger and more relevant effect sizes for disease associations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 156 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 21%
Researcher 25 15%
Student > Master 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 36 21%
Unknown 29 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 14%
Computer Science 8 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 34 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2021.
All research outputs
#855,153
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#69
of 2,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,816
of 285,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.