↓ Skip to main content

Identification of oncogenic driver mutations by genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 dropout screening

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
Title
Identification of oncogenic driver mutations by genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 dropout screening
Published in
BMC Genomics, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12864-016-3042-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael K. Kiessling, Sven Schuierer, Silke Stertz, Martin Beibel, Sebastian Bergling, Judith Knehr, Walter Carbone, Cheryl de Vallière, Joelle Tchinda, Tewis Bouwmeester, Klaus Seuwen, Gerhard Rogler, Guglielmo Roma

Abstract

Genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 dropout screens can identify genes whose knockout affects cell viability. Recent CRISPR screens detected thousands of essential genes required for cellular survival and key cellular processes; however discovering novel lineage-specific genetic dependencies from the many hits still remains a challenge. To assess whether CRISPR-Cas9 dropout screens can help identify cancer dependencies, we screened two human cancer cell lines carrying known and distinct oncogenic mutations using a genome-wide sgRNA library. We found that the gRNA targeting the driver mutation EGFR was one of the highest-ranking candidates in the EGFR-mutant HCC-827 lung adenocarcinoma cell line. Likewise, sgRNAs for NRAS and MAP2K1 (MEK1), a downstream kinase of mutant NRAS, were identified among the top hits in the NRAS-mutant neuroblastoma cell line CHP-212. Depletion of these genes targeted by the sgRNAs strongly correlated with the sensitivity to specific kinase inhibitors of the EGFR or RAS pathway in cell viability assays. In addition, we describe other dependencies such as TBK1 in HCC-827 cells and TRIB2 in CHP-212 cells which merit further investigation. We show that genome-wide CRISPR dropout screens are suitable for the identification of oncogenic drivers and other essential genes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Croatia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 141 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 42 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 20%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 21 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 59 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 8%
Engineering 5 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 20 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2016.
All research outputs
#14,931,785
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#5,848
of 10,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,811
of 333,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#143
of 298 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,793 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 298 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.