↓ Skip to main content

Signatures of prostate-derived Ets factor (PDEF) in cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Signatures of prostate-derived Ets factor (PDEF) in cancer
Published in
Tumor Biology, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13277-016-5326-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nitin Mahajan

Abstract

The Ets proteins are a family of transcription factors characterized by an evolutionarily conserved DNA-binding domain and have diverse biological functions including tumor suppressor as well as tumor promoter functions. They are regulated via a complex and diverse number of mechanisms and control key cellular processes. Prostate-derived Ets transcription factor (PDEF), a unique member of the ETS family, is present in tissues with high epithelial content are hormone-regulated, such as prostate, breast, salivary glands, ovaries, colon, airways, and stomach tissues. PDEF (prostate-derived Ets factor) is also referred to as SPDEF (SAM pointed domain containing Ets transcription factor), PSE (mouse homolog), or hPSE (human PSE) in the literature and is the sole member of the PDEF ETS sub-family. The role of PDEF in cancer development is still not fully elucidated though. The present article focuses on the key findings about the PDEF's biological functions, interacting proteins, and its target genes. There is a strong urge to focus on the clinical studies in larger cohort, which elucidate the regulation of PDEF and its target genes, to determine the potential of PDEF as biomarker. Based on the studies discussed in the present article, one can anticipate that PDEF offers a great potential for developing therapeutics against cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 36%
Student > Postgraduate 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,384,302
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#1,051
of 2,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,287
of 325,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#42
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,623 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.