You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Resolving conflicts in fire management using decision theory: asset‐protection versus biodiversity conservation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Conservation Letters, August 2010
|
DOI | 10.1111/j.1755-263x.2010.00115.x |
Authors |
Don A. Driscoll, David B. Lindenmayer, Andrew F. Bennett, Michael Bode, Ross A. Bradstock, Geoffrey J. Cary, Michael F. Clarke, Nick Dexter, Rod Fensham, Gordon Friend, Malcolm Gill, Stuart James, Geoff Kay, David A. Keith, Chris MacGregor, Hugh P. Possingham, Jeremy Russel‐Smith, David Salt, James E. M. Watson, Dick Williams, Alan York |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 5 | 3% |
United States | 2 | 1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Peru | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 171 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 41 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 19% |
Student > Master | 23 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 6% |
Other | 31 | 17% |
Unknown | 27 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 61 | 34% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 28% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 4% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Other | 17 | 9% |
Unknown | 35 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2013.
All research outputs
#2,384,336
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#608
of 1,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,827
of 103,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.