You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Caesarean Delivery and Subsequent Stillbirth or Miscarriage: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0054588 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sinéad M. O’Neill, Patricia M. Kearney, Louise C. Kenny, Ali S. Khashan, Tine B. Henriksen, Jennifer E. Lutomski, Richard A. Greene |
| Abstract |
To compare the risk of stillbirth and miscarriage in a subsequent pregnancy in women with a previous caesarean or vaginal delivery. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Ireland | 1 | 13% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 34 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,715,736
of 23,642,687 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#33,998
of 201,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,409
of 284,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#762
of 5,006 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,642,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,006 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.