You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A wildlife tolerance model and case study for understanding human wildlife conflicts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.07.002 |
| Authors |
Ruth Kansky, Martin Kidd, Andrew T. Knight |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| Portugal | 1 | 11% |
| Germany | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 22% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 565 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 560 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 120 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 109 | 19% |
| Researcher | 69 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 58 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 5% |
| Other | 74 | 13% |
| Unknown | 108 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 174 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 169 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 38 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 1% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 47 | 8% |
| Unknown | 123 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,519,525
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#2,750
of 6,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,567
of 348,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#37
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.