↓ Skip to main content

Non-cognate translation priming in masked priming lexical decision experiments: A meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Non-cognate translation priming in masked priming lexical decision experiments: A meta-analysis
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, September 2016
DOI 10.3758/s13423-016-1151-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yun Wen, Walter J. B. van Heuven

Abstract

The masked translation priming paradigm has been widely used in the last 25 years to investigate word processing in bilinguals. Motivated by studies reporting mixed findings, in particular for second language (L2) to first language (L1) translation priming, we conducted, for the first time in the literature, a meta-analysis of 64 masked priming lexical decision experiments across 24 studies to assess the effect sizes of L1-L2 and L2-L1 non-cognate translation priming effects in bilinguals. Our meta-analysis also investigated the influence of potential moderators of translation priming effects. The results provided clear evidence of significant translation priming effects for both directions, with L1-L2 translation priming significantly larger than L2-L1 translation priming (i.e., effect size of 0.86 vs. 0.31). The analyses also revealed that L1-L2 translation effect sizes were moderated by the interval between prime and target (ISI), whereas L2-L1 translation effect sizes were modulated by the number of items per cell. Theoretical and methodological implications of this meta-analysis are discussed and recommendations for future studies are provided.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Professor 4 5%
Researcher 4 5%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 26 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 28 36%
Psychology 14 18%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Chemistry 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 32 42%