↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms of Action for Acupuncture in the Oncology Setting

Overview of attention for article published in Current Treatment Options in Oncology, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Mechanisms of Action for Acupuncture in the Oncology Setting
Published in
Current Treatment Options in Oncology, November 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11864-010-0128-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer A. M. Stone, Peter A. S. Johnstone

Abstract

A growing body of literature supports the use of acupuncture in the oncology clinic for the relief of symptoms caused by cancer treatments. Several clinical trials are currently supported by the National Institutes of Health to assess the efficacy of such treatments, as evidenced by the listings in the National Institutes of Health Computer Retrieval of Information on Scientific Projects (CRISP) database. However, little is known about the mechanisms of action behind the effects of acupuncture. A biomedical database search for articles in the English-language literature revealed studies examining the effect of acupuncture on fibroblast cells, a decrease of inflammatory cytokines, an increase of T-lymphocytes, and increasing adenosine, neuropeptides, opioid peptides, peptide hormones, and stem cells. This limited review attempts to reveal some possible mechanisms of action for the effects of acupuncture for symptom relief in the oncology setting.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 4%
Australia 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 49 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 17%
Researcher 8 15%
Other 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Other 14 26%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Psychology 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 11 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2014.
All research outputs
#17,676,164
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from Current Treatment Options in Oncology
#427
of 654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,523
of 179,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Treatment Options in Oncology
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 654 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.