| Title |
Are judgments of learning made after correct responses during retrieval practice sensitive to lag and criterion level effects?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Memory & Cognition, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3758/s13421-012-0200-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mary A. Pyc, Katherine A. Rawson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 7 | 16% |
| Researcher | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 13 | 29% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 20 | 44% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,384,302
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#947
of 1,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,320
of 156,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.