↓ Skip to main content

Mutational signatures of ionizing radiation in second malignancies

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
32 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
112 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
221 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
330 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mutational signatures of ionizing radiation in second malignancies
Published in
Nature Communications, September 2016
DOI 10.1038/ncomms12605
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sam Behjati, Gunes Gundem, David C. Wedge, Nicola D. Roberts, Patrick S. Tarpey, Susanna L. Cooke, Peter Van Loo, Ludmil B. Alexandrov, Manasa Ramakrishna, Helen Davies, Serena Nik-Zainal, Claire Hardy, Calli Latimer, Keiran M. Raine, Lucy Stebbings, Andy Menzies, David Jones, Rebecca Shepherd, Adam P. Butler, Jon W. Teague, Mette Jorgensen, Bhavisha Khatri, Nischalan Pillay, Adam Shlien, P. Andrew Futreal, Christophe Badie, Ultan McDermott, G. Steven Bova, Andrea L. Richardson, Adrienne M. Flanagan, Michael R. Stratton, Peter J. Campbell

Abstract

Ionizing radiation is a potent carcinogen, inducing cancer through DNA damage. The signatures of mutations arising in human tissues following in vivo exposure to ionizing radiation have not been documented. Here, we searched for signatures of ionizing radiation in 12 radiation-associated second malignancies of different tumour types. Two signatures of somatic mutation characterize ionizing radiation exposure irrespective of tumour type. Compared with 319 radiation-naive tumours, radiation-associated tumours carry a median extra 201 deletions genome-wide, sized 1-100 base pairs often with microhomology at the junction. Unlike deletions of radiation-naive tumours, these show no variation in density across the genome or correlation with sequence context, replication timing or chromatin structure. Furthermore, we observe a significant increase in balanced inversions in radiation-associated tumours. Both small deletions and inversions generate driver mutations. Thus, ionizing radiation generates distinctive mutational signatures that explain its carcinogenic potential.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 112 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 330 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 2%
Germany 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 320 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 70 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 19%
Student > Bachelor 29 9%
Student > Master 25 8%
Professor 22 7%
Other 59 18%
Unknown 62 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 75 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 61 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 16%
Computer Science 11 3%
Physics and Astronomy 6 2%
Other 42 13%
Unknown 82 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 333. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#100,655
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#1,471
of 57,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,110
of 331,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#28
of 873 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 873 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.