↓ Skip to main content

Reconsolidation from negative emotional pictures: Is successful retrieval required?

Overview of attention for article published in Memory & Cognition, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Reconsolidation from negative emotional pictures: Is successful retrieval required?
Published in
Memory & Cognition, April 2012
DOI 10.3758/s13421-012-0203-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bridgid Finn, Henry L. Roediger, Emily Rosenzweig

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
India 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 84 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 20%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Professor 7 8%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 47 53%
Neuroscience 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 15 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,384,302
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#947
of 1,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,740
of 161,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#6
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.