↓ Skip to main content

Harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) can steer by the stars

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
73 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
Title
Harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) can steer by the stars
Published in
Animal Cognition, May 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10071-008-0156-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Björn Mauck, Nele Gläser, Wolfhard Schlosser, Guido Dehnhardt

Abstract

Offshore orientation in marine mammals is still a mystery. For visual orientation during night-time foraging and travelling in the open seas, seals cannot rely on distant terrestrial landmarks, and thus might use celestial cues as repeatedly shown for nocturnally migrating birds. Although seals detect enough stars to probably allow for astronavigation, it was unclear whether they can orient by the night sky. The widely accepted cognitive mechanism for bird night-time orientation by celestial cues is a time-independent star compass with learned geometrical star configurations used to pinpoint north as the rotational centre of the starry sky while there is no conclusive evidence for a time-compensated star compass or true star navigation. Here, we present results for two harbour seals orienting in a custom made swimming planetarium. Both seals learned to highly accurately identify a lodestar out of a pseudo-randomly oriented, realistic projection of the northern hemisphere night sky. Providing the first evidence for star orientation capability in a marine mammal, our seals' outstanding directional precision would allow them to steer by following lodestars of learned star courses, a celestial orientation mechanism that has been known to be used by Polynesian navigators but has not been considered for animals yet.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 121 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 20%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Master 9 7%
Other 8 6%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 17 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 50%
Environmental Science 14 11%
Psychology 9 7%
Physics and Astronomy 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 19 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 199. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2023.
All research outputs
#200,900
of 25,617,409 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#65
of 1,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311
of 87,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,617,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them