↓ Skip to main content

To drain or not to drain: an analysis of abscess drains in the treatment of appendicitis with abscess

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Surgery International, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
To drain or not to drain: an analysis of abscess drains in the treatment of appendicitis with abscess
Published in
Pediatric Surgery International, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00383-013-3262-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandra C. Gasior, E. Marty Knott, Daniel J. Ostlie, Shawn D. St. Peter

Abstract

Perforated appendicitis is associated with abscess formation before or after appendectomy. Many abscesses are not amenable to drainage due to size or location. In this study, we compare patients who had a drain placed for an abscess to those who were treated without a drain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 43 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 63%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Unknown 14 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2013.
All research outputs
#15,261,106
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Surgery International
#569
of 1,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,789
of 280,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Surgery International
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,246 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.