| Title |
Plant functional traits – fixed facts or variable depending on the season?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Folia Geobotanica, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12224-016-9250-3 |
| Authors |
Christine Römermann, Solveig Franziska Bucher, Melanie Hahn, Markus Bernhardt-Römermann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 19% |
| Australia | 2 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Peru | 1 | 6% |
| Estonia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 50% |
| Scientists | 7 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 104 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 23% |
| Researcher | 20 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 50% |
| Environmental Science | 26 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 18 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2017.
All research outputs
#4,228,756
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Folia Geobotanica
#9
of 310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,550
of 342,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folia Geobotanica
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 310 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them