↓ Skip to main content

Fruit and Vegetable Intake and Risk of Breast Cancer by Hormone Receptor Status

Overview of attention for article published in JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
28 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
160 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fruit and Vegetable Intake and Risk of Breast Cancer by Hormone Receptor Status
Published in
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, February 2013
DOI 10.1093/jnci/djs635
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seungyoun Jung, Donna Spiegelman, Laura Baglietto, Leslie Bernstein, Deborah A Boggs, Piet A van den Brandt, Julie E Buring, James R Cerhan, Mia M Gaudet, Graham G Giles, Gary Goodman, Niclas Hakansson, Susan E Hankinson, Kathy Helzlsouer, Pamela L Horn-Ross, Manami Inoue, Vittorio Krogh, Marie Lof, Marjorie L McCullough, Anthony B Miller, Marian L Neuhouser, Julie R Palmer, Yikyung Park, Kim Robien, Thomas E Rohan, Stephanie Scarmo, Catherine Schairer, Leo J Schouten, James M Shikany, Sabina Sieri, Schoichiro Tsugane, Kala Visvanathan, Elisabete Weiderpass, Walter C Willett, Alicja Wolk, Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Shumin M Zhang, Xuehong Zhang, Regina G Ziegler, Stephanie A Smith-Warner

Abstract

Estrogen receptor-negative (ER(-)) breast cancer has few known or modifiable risk factors. Because ER(-) tumors account for only 15% to 20% of breast cancers, large pooled analyses are necessary to evaluate precisely the suspected inverse association between fruit and vegetable intake and risk of ER(-) breast cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 173 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 17%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Other 10 6%
Other 36 20%
Unknown 41 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 6%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 44 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2023.
All research outputs
#462,936
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#300
of 7,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,408
of 291,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#6
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.