↓ Skip to main content

VisTrails SAHM: visualization and workflow management for species habitat modeling

Overview of attention for article published in Ecography, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
VisTrails SAHM: visualization and workflow management for species habitat modeling
Published in
Ecography, January 2013
DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07815.x
Authors

Jeffrey T. Morisette, Catherine S. Jarnevich, Tracy R. Holcombe, Colin B. Talbert, Drew Ignizio, Marian K. Talbert, Claudio Silva, David Koop, Alan Swanson, Nicholas E. Young

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 7%
Brazil 3 2%
Australia 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 110 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 15%
Student > Master 19 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 13 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 36%
Environmental Science 34 26%
Computer Science 7 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 5%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 25 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2015.
All research outputs
#4,398,662
of 24,641,327 outputs
Outputs from Ecography
#1,058
of 2,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,934
of 290,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecography
#4
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,641,327 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.