| Title |
Randomized controlled trial of pelvic floor muscle training with or without biofeedback for urinary incontinence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00192-012-2012-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tomoe Hirakawa, Shigeyuki Suzuki, Kumiko Kato, Momokazu Gotoh, Yoko Yoshikawa |
| Abstract |
To compare the effects of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), with or without biofeedback (BF), for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), focusing on condition-specific quality of life (QOL) outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 247 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 6% |
| Researcher | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 14% |
| Unknown | 87 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 54 | 22% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 3% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Unknown | 95 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,930,204
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#631
of 2,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,473
of 290,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#12
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.