↓ Skip to main content

Automatic 3D liver location and segmentation via convolutional neural network and graph cut

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 977)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
250 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
288 Mendeley
Title
Automatic 3D liver location and segmentation via convolutional neural network and graph cut
Published in
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11548-016-1467-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fang Lu, Fa Wu, Peijun Hu, Zhiyi Peng, Dexing Kong

Abstract

Segmentation of the liver from abdominal computed tomography (CT) images is an essential step in some computer-assisted clinical interventions, such as surgery planning for living donor liver transplant, radiotherapy and volume measurement. In this work, we develop a deep learning algorithm with graph cut refinement to automatically segment the liver in CT scans. The proposed method consists of two main steps: (i) simultaneously liver detection and probabilistic segmentation using 3D convolutional neural network; (ii) accuracy refinement of the initial segmentation with graph cut and the previously learned probability map. The proposed approach was validated on forty CT volumes taken from two public databases MICCAI-Sliver07 and 3Dircadb1. For the MICCAI-Sliver07 test dataset, the calculated mean ratios of volumetric overlap error (VOE), relative volume difference (RVD), average symmetric surface distance (ASD), root-mean-square symmetric surface distance (RMSD) and maximum symmetric surface distance (MSD) are 5.9, 2.7 %, 0.91, 1.88 and 18.94 mm, respectively. For the 3Dircadb1 dataset, the calculated mean ratios of VOE, RVD, ASD, RMSD and MSD are 9.36, 0.97 %, 1.89, 4.15 and 33.14 mm, respectively. The proposed method is fully automatic without any user interaction. Quantitative results reveal that the proposed approach is efficient and accurate for hepatic volume estimation in a clinical setup. The high correlation between the automatic and manual references shows that the proposed method can be good enough to replace the time-consuming and nonreproducible manual segmentation method.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 287 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 22%
Student > Master 43 15%
Researcher 34 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Student > Bachelor 19 7%
Other 41 14%
Unknown 68 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 99 34%
Engineering 49 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 10%
Physics and Astronomy 7 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 81 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,796,273
of 25,605,018 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#39
of 977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,592
of 345,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,605,018 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 977 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.