| Title |
The global amphibian trade flows through Europe: the need for enforcing and improving legislation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-016-1193-8 |
| Authors |
Mark Auliya, Jaime García-Moreno, Benedikt R. Schmidt, Dirk S. Schmeller, Marinus S. Hoogmoed, Matthew C. Fisher, Frank Pasmans, Klaus Henle, David Bickford, An Martel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 38% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 116 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 14% |
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 25 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 20 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,113,224
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#132
of 2,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,859
of 333,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#4
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.