↓ Skip to main content

Simultaneous Inactivation of the p16, p15 and p14 Genes Encoding Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitors in Canine T-Lymphoid Tumor Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Simultaneous Inactivation of the p16, p15 and p14 Genes Encoding Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitors in Canine T-Lymphoid Tumor Cells
Published in
Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, January 2013
DOI 10.1292/jvms.12-0351
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aki FUJIWARA-IGARASHI, Yuko GOTO-KOSHINO, Hiroyuki MOCHIZUKI, Shingo MAEDA, Yasuhito FUJINO, Koichi OHNO, Hajime TSUJIMOTO

Abstract

The p16, p15 and p14 genes are widely known as tumor suppressor genes in human medicine. Although a large number of genetic and epigenetic aberrations in these genes have been reported in human malignancies, canine malignancies have not been well analyzed on the aberrations of these genes. In this study, the full-length complementary DNA (cDNA) of the canine p16 gene was cloned using the 5' and 3' rapid amplification of cDNA ends methods. Based on the sequence data, primers specific for p16, p15 and p14 were designed. Using these primers, the expression of p16, p15 and p14 mRNAs could be individually evaluated by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Genomic aberrations were also examined using genomic polymerase chain reaction. Two of the 6 canine lymphoid tumor cell lines did not express detectable levels of p16, p15 and p14 mRNAs, and wide-ranging deletions in the p15-p14-p16 genomic locus were suspected. Wide-ranging deletions were also speculated in 2 of 14 dogs with T-cell lymphoid tumors. On the other hand, similar failure of amplification suggesting wide-ranging deletions were not observed in any of the 14 dogs with B-cell lymphoma. Deletion of the p15-p14-p16 genomic locus could be one of the molecular aberrations in canine lymphoid tumor cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Professor 2 13%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2013.
All research outputs
#20,653,708
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
#2,043
of 3,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,226
of 288,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
#16
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,546 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.