↓ Skip to main content

Receipt of Opioid Analgesics by HIV-Infected and Uninfected Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Receipt of Opioid Analgesics by HIV-Infected and Uninfected Patients
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11606-012-2189-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Jennifer Edelman, Kirsha Gordon, William C. Becker, Joseph L. Goulet, Melissa Skanderson, Julie R. Gaither, Jennifer Brennan Braden, Adam J. Gordon, Robert D. Kerns, Amy C. Justice, David A. Fiellin

Abstract

Opioids are increasingly prescribed, but there are limited data on opioid receipt by HIV status.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 72 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 22%
Researcher 13 18%
Other 4 5%
Student > Master 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 18 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 39%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 7%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 23 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2013.
All research outputs
#13,844,112
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#5,090
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,180
of 151,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#47
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.